Re: [linux-audio-user] U.S. Copyright: was FOLKS, PAY......

From: R Parker <rtp405@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Dec 23 2005 - 02:16:24 EET

--- John Mulholland <johnmulholland@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:

>
> >>I want to publish with a free service on the
> internet
> >>that establishes an equivalent to the poor man's
> >>registration. Is this happening yet?
> >>
> >This is a really good idea. I think to make it
> binding in court though you'd
> >need a Notary Public and a witness. You could dump
> the written part to paper,
> >date it, witness it, and stamp it. I'm not sure
> how you could deal with the
> >music portion but some variation on the first theme
> should work. I doubt if
> >you'd be able to provide it for free but you might
> make it a lot cheaper than the
> >US Copyright Office. The real trick is, would it
> stand up in court.
> >
> >
> I guess there is always Creative Commons. Although,
> has it set a legal
> precedent yet?

The CCs are licenses that a copyright holder uses to
describe how people can use their property. I am
clueless as to whether it's been held to test in a
court of law.

ron

        
                
__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
Received on Fri Dec 23 04:15:06 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 23 2005 - 04:15:07 EET