On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:28:08 +0100
Carlo Capocasa <capocasa@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> My question, how useful is 192kHz for practical purposes? How quickly is
> that likely to change? I'd really appreciate some advice here, thank you.
I've got a card that does 24/96 (a Delta 1010). In a side by side test,
I _think_ my old ears hear the slightest of differences between recordings
done at 24/96 and those done at 16/44, but in the end, I decided to save
the disk space and always record at 16/44, since everything I do is going to
get resampled to that anyway for CDs.
--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@email-addr-hidden
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
Received on Thu Jan 26 16:15:13 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 26 2006 - 16:15:14 EET