Hi Paul, thanks for replying! I'm shaken with the depth of your
knowledge, as always! :)
>>Similar to 96 khz. Totally useless.
> although i agree about 192, 96 does have one distinct benefit. the
> higher the SR, the easier it is to make a really nice brickwall filter
How very detailed... Thankya!
> and once again, please recall that the most of greatest recordings of
> the last 50 years were almost done on technology whose "sound quality"
> would generally be laughed at today.
Yeah... yeah, yeah, yeah I'm hanging that one up over my bed.
Carlo
Received on Fri Jan 27 00:15:09 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 27 2006 - 00:15:09 EET