Re: [linux-audio-user] Need for JACK Rack (2)?

leslie.polzer@email-addr-hidden wrote:

>Hello everyone!
>
>On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:49:21PM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
>
>
>
>>Leslie, have you tried om?
>>
>>
>Thank you, Loki. That application slipped my attention because I had
>no good net connection for the past half year.
> It looks very promising.
>
>
>
>>is jack rack 2 really required for something?
>>
>>
>That's a question I'd like to pose here.
> Are there any JACK Rack users that can convince me they will need it
>in the future and tell me why they do not use other tools?
>
> Best wishes to you all,
>
> Leslie
>
>
>
Leslie,
my suggestion is to keep working on Jack Rack. Don't pay too much
attention to what other software is around. Don't think in terms of
competition.

Some users will always prefer your software, some will be attracted by
om or other programs. Or they'll use both, but for different tasks. Open
source is also about choice.

If you'll enjoy adding support for more channels, do it. Otherwise, just
try to keep the project alive.

c.

-- 
www.cesaremarilungo.com