On Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 01:26:04PM -0500, Spencer Russell wrote:
> Hullo, there,
> I'm working on getting usable latency on my laptop with a crappy
> integrated Via chipset(Right now the best I can do without xruns is
> 2x1024). From what I can tell it looks like it might hep to thread the
> IRQs, so I'm applying ingo's realtime-preempt patch to a vanilla
> 2.6.15.1. I have been using the gentoo suspend2 sources, and I've
> gotten really used to just hibernating my computer when I'm not using
> it, and I'd like to keep doing that, but it seems the suspend2 patches
> are incompatible with the realtime-preempt patches. I think I'll be
> able to handle going in manually and figuring out where the problems
> are, but I figured that it's possible someone might have already done
> the work for me, so I figured I'd ask. So, anyone using suspend2 and
> realtime-preempt together?
have you tried applying both patches over another? theres a chance they don't conflict.
assuming they do,, you could try suspend, or standby, instead of hibernate. they use a bit more power since since the contents of RAM are preserved. or just switch to initng and fluxbox, and boot into a usable desktop from scratch in about 10 seconds..
>
> Thanks,
> spencer
Received on Thu Feb 9 00:15:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 09 2006 - 00:15:06 EET