[linux-audio-user] Re: rosegarden+dssi

From: emanuele ..:: www.rumoridifondo.com ::.. <emanuele@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Feb 10 2006 - 14:13:59 EET

damn, it's a shame that i don't manage to compile it....
thank you for the information

bye
emanuele

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Oggetto:
> Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: rosegarden+dssi
> Da:
> Carotinho <carotinobg@email-addr-hidden>
> Data:
> Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:58:17 +0100
> A:
> A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden>
>
> A:
> A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden>
>
>
>Hi!
>
>The main reason is that when you save your project, Rosegarden save the
>configuration of your DSSI, patches loaded and so on, so you don't have to
>open jack-dssi-host with the right plugin and load the patch you needed.
>Besides, you can add directly some LADSPA to the DSSI track, without
>referring to another software. Final point, but this is more related to my
>setup, when I route the UART midi of my soundcard to Rosegarden, and I select
>a track inside Rosegarden, whichever channel I play on my MIDI keyboard, it
>gets translated on the fly (my midi keyboard is an arranger playing on
>different channels), while on Jack-dssi-host you have to route the midi
>everytime you change the instrument, choose the channel etc.
>
>These are the reason why I'm fond of DSSI, it makes easier working with synths
>in a sequencer, just like VST.
>
>Byez!
>
>Carotinho
>
>
>
>
>
>___________________________________
>Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
>http://mail.yahoo.it
>
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 10 16:15:07 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 10 2006 - 16:15:08 EET