On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:10 +0100, Marcos Guglielmetti wrote:
> El Domingo, 12 de Febrero de 2006 20:17, Lee Revell escribió:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 20:14 +0100, Esben Stien wrote:
> > > Marcos Guglielmetti <marcospcmusica@email-addr-hidden> writes:
> > > > I am working with this kernel right now (2.6.15.3-rt)
> > >
> > > The rt patches are not supposed to be compiled against such
> > > versions as .1, .2 or .3, as far as I know, unless the patch is
> > > called f.ex 2.6.15.3-rt1. In most cases this will work, but it's
> > > not guaranteed and therefor you should not report any issues you
> > > have.
> > >
> > > This is how I understand it.
> >
> > Yes but it's not like it's going to compile, run, then give you a ton
> > of xruns - it will either work fine, or fail to build/boot.
> >
> > If it seems to be working this is not a problem.
>
>
> Ok, so I think I will not try with
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.15.tar.bz2 because I
> will have the same behaviorals. Am I right?
>
Yes exactly. You will see the same behavior.
Lee
Received on Mon Feb 13 04:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 13 2006 - 04:15:05 EET