On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:35 +0100, fons adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:03:52PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:45 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> >
> > > That is rediculous. Do you really have to start program that way
> > > to get realtime priority? In case, I guess (and _really_ hope)
> > > that realtime-lsm (or something similar) will continue to exist for a
> > > long time still.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, absolutely, it is ridiculous.
>
> Is it really ? If you start apps via an icon or menu, you
> don't see any difference at all. If you use a terminal
> to start them, just define an alias. Having a prefix such
> as nice, sudo, or rt_limits -r is not really worse than
> having options (IMHO).
>
No, it's not that bad, but IMHO it's more of a pain than the realtime
LSM, or the PAM solution. It's just too confusing for users when there
are 3 different ways to do the same thing for no apparent reason. So
I'm recommending they stick with realtime LSM until the new rlimits are
fully supported by most distros.
Lee
Received on Mon Feb 13 04:15:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 13 2006 - 04:15:10 EET