Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 2/19/06, pirrone <pirrone@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Strong preference for Fluxbox.
>>
>
> I second all the good stuff about fluxbox technically and its low
> system resource usage, but as a day to day environment for running
> stuff like Crossover Office, Open Office, etc., I got too tired having
> to make all my menus by hand.
>
> - Mark
>
>
>
Geez Mark, a vigorous young man like yourself. The shame! How hard is
[exec] (Ardour) {ardour -n} or running menumaker?
Actually, and joking aside as I'm kidding you and it's been a long time
since we've "talked" with the last being probably about Fluxbox as well,
I truly appreciate "having" to make my menus by hand since not only is
it quick and easy but it results in precisely what I what to then be
able to use.
For me Fluxbox, with groups and keys provides the absolutely optimized
environment for exactly what I am doing. There's no way things would
simply shake out like this in one of the automated desktops - KDE,
Gnome, and the high-priced spreads.
I understand the straightforward simplicity of graphically editing menus
using desktop tools but truly feel I have much more at my disposal with
this environment, not less. Not less in any way.
Frank
Received on Sun Feb 26 20:16:09 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:16:09 EET