On 2/20/06, Loki Davison <loki.davison@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 2/20/06, Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:03:23AM -0500, Dana Olson wrote:
> > >
> > > Heh. So, there's no GUI anymore? I'm debating on if I should package
> > > this or not at this time. If I do, all I really need are the .om
> > > files, but I'd like to put them in with the rest of the .om files that
> > > ship with Om.
> >
> > I think you should _not_ package it. The patches need to be cleaned up.
> > But that should wait for the next Om release, as the patches will have
> > to be adapted for it anyway.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Thorsten Wilms
> >
>
> I agree with Thorsten here, i'd like more users, etc but Om has had
> major changes, and current svn has had major improvements however it
> will only work with current om cvs. Thus really need to wait for next
> release of om before any packaging should be done.
>
> Loki
Yeah, I decided that it's cutting it too close to Ubuntu's feature
freeze, which is in <3 days, anyhow.
I packaged the latest release of Om and Omins, but it's too bad that
0.3.0 wasn't out already. Ah well, that's how the Cookie Crisp
crumbles.
Dana
Received on Sun Feb 26 20:16:50 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:16:50 EET