On Sunday 19 February 2006 22:03, thewade was like:
> How does this do for processing overhead?
> I have been using fluxbox on my "performance" machine because it is
> lightweight but there are some features that I would like to have that
> don't seem supported in that manager. I use gnome 2.10 on my other
> machine because there isin't much you can do to make a pentium 700mHz
> speedy enough to do a lot of realtime processing.
>
> Lets say your building a machine for live realtime processing
> performance using PD: what windomanager is lightweight enough to not
> draw too much CPU power away from the audio apps, yet has a "desktop"
> and a customizable menubar able to do menus inside of menus?
>
> fluxbox cant seem to display a "desktop" and iconbox only does icons
> and isin't really a menu system.
>
> The gnome screen: http://aproximation.org/transport-screen.jpg
Use fbpanel + rox
-- cheers, tim hall http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/timReceived on Sun Feb 26 20:16:55 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:16:55 EET
