On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 05:23 +0100, Björn Lindström wrote:
> "pjfjacks" <pjfjacks@email-addr-hidden>:
>
> > To say that a software author cannot "own" that software nor have
> > copyrights to it is the same as to say an author / poet /
> > screenwriter / columnist / etc. cannot have any control over his
> > work (or get paid for doing it) once it is finished.
>
> Well, this is really the case for most professional
> authoring/poeting/screenwriting/columnwriting already. Private persons
> aren't usually equipped to take advantage of the copyright laws, since
> they are designed for (and to a large extent by) publishing companies.
>
Maybe in your country. In the US, copyright is automatic and
doesn't even have to be registered (since 1998). Registering copyright
can help you to defend it but all you have to do to claim copyright is
to "publish" the work. In the legal sense "publish" means to issue the
work on any medium with a claim of copyright on it to someone other than
yourself.
> So, to claim that protecting the current set of laws for immaterial
> monopolies is a protection of artist's and writer's rights is
> hypocrisy.
>
Not really hypocrisy, some of the merits of copyright should be self
evident. Unfortunately Disney, and Sonny Bono, hijacked the US
copyright law and changed it from a reasonable limit to something
ridiculous.
> Anyway, it's useless to argue about this in terms of who has the
> "right" to what. Copyright is a legal invention. Of course it should
> be discussed and changed as the premises for publication changes.
>
> In addition, people seem to forget it was invented to encourage
> _publication_. Obviously there has never been any need to motivate
> people economically to get them to express themselves creatively.
>
> For my part I see little reason to preserve a law for that purpose,
> now that we have the technology for anyone to publish any kind of
> content at practically no cost.
I keep asking for this but no one is taking me up on it...send me a
copy of your latest song or novel and after I put my name on it and
publish it on the internet with me as the author we'll talk about
whether you think copyright is important.
>
-- Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner The Fuzzy Dice http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/fuzzy.html "As we enjoy great advantages from the invention of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." Benjamin Franklin, on declining patents offered by the governor of Pennsylvania for his "Pennsylvania Fireplace", c. 1744Received on Sun Feb 26 20:19:40 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:19:40 EET