On Fri February 24 2006 12:49, Dana Olson wrote:
> great application just the same. But I'll likely use seq24
> myself, as it seems more like my hardware-based
> sequencer/synth. So, to the OP, there's an option to look into
> if you can deal with loop/pattern-based sequencers.
I'll have to look into that myself, as I prefer at least starting
in a pattern-based environment for most of my songs. Thanks.
Rob
Received on Sun Feb 26 20:20:48 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:20:48 EET