philicorda wrote:
>Paradoxically, the only way to avoid digital artifacts is by the use of
>dithering. This can be proved. There is such thing as correct dithering.
>
>
perhaps we should fork this discussion off at some point...... anyway, i
agree with your assessment of the state of digital fidelity and also the
importance of good dithering. i have two questions:
1. how would you characterize correct dithering?
2. are there existing LINUX tools to do it properly?
back when i used windows, i found the FIR-based noise-shaping dither in
"Resample" from SoundsLogical to be much more pleasing to the ear in
ambient tails, than other types i had used. unfortunately, the best i
have seen in linux-based tools is triangular dither.
.pltk.
Received on Mon Feb 27 04:15:27 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 27 2006 - 04:15:28 EET