Re: [linux-audio-user] Digital Fidelity

>I merely mentioned that as another example of psychoacoustic masking that
>supposedly one cannot hear - yet I can.
>I can also hear the difference between a digital copy and the original
>sound file, and between the same generation of digital copies on different
>hard drives.
>I can hear radical differences in audio quality between CDs burned at
>different speeds.
>Theoretically - or mathematically as you wish to present it - I shouldn't
>be able to hear any of this: they are all mathematically the same, and
>should sound identical - but they do not.
>
>
=-O

I mean, this is uneducating to say the least.

c.

-- 
www.cesaremarilungo.com