tim hall wrote:
> Yes, but you can't release those pieces under cc licenses unless you
> have control of copyright. You lose copyright then you lose the right
> to license those pieces altogether. Being an amateur is a middle-class
> luxury.
To me, being an amateur is to make art for the sake of art. and being a
pro its just a job.
If you're right, for similar reasons, maybe also coding software and
releasing it as open source should be a middle-class luxury. Is this the
case? I don't think so.
And anyway, how does this thread about copyright and open source relate
to being an amateur?
c.
-- www.cesaremarilungo.comReceived on Tue Feb 28 04:15:25 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 28 2006 - 04:15:26 EET