Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Smack ideas. What else do people want in a drum synth?

From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Mar 05 2006 - 08:30:35 EET

On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:39:42PM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
> > Being completely ignorant about smack I don't know if
> > it sequences but if you do I'd encourage not doing it
> > by pattern interface. Use the percussion staff. It's
> > so much easier than pattern interfaces and if it did
> > realtime playback upon note input anyone could learn
> > to read the percussion staff in about 10 minutes. OK,
> > maybe five minutes.
> >
>
> Doesn't do sequencing ;-)
>
> > And if smack doesn't do sequencing then how about
> > something rare like good documentation. I'd love to
> > study synthesis I just haven't had the time to do it.
> >
>
> good idea... documentation.... don't have any of that at the moment....

What about your thesis paper?

-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Linux Audio Developer and Sysadmin
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network@email-addr-hidden.
Received on Sun Mar 5 12:15:13 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 05 2006 - 12:15:13 EET