Hallo,
Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 23:03 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > The good thing is, that with barebones the manufacturer often tries to
> > follow the standards a bit more, because in the long run it will make
> > it easier for them as far as support etc. is concerned. These
> > barebones are sold under various different brandnames, so they like to
> > keep this side of possible failures as small as possible.
>
> Right, but I don't think there's any standard that says laptops must be
> usable for low latency or prohibits the BIOS from implementing ACPI via
> SMM...
>
> The only way to be sure is if there were a vendor who sold laptops
> certified for low latency.
As this probably won't happen (soon) maybe it's indeed best to try to
create a kind of whitelist as you suggested. And of course a
blacklist, which could create pressure on manufacturers. I guess, not
only Linux is affected by a latency-killing BIOS, right?
Ciao
-- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__Received on Wed Mar 29 04:15:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 29 2006 - 04:15:08 EEST