Thomas Kuther wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:41:24 -0500
> "Reuben Martin" <reuben.m@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Can you file a Gentoo bug report asking them to fully support
>>>>> the RTPRIO rlimit?
>>> <SNIP>
>>>> First step is for me to research the Gentoo bugzilla and see what
>>>> I can find. I'll get back to you with that.
>>>>
>>> Seems that there has been a report for 8 months with no action
>>> taken:
>> Yeah, I'm the one who filed it. I don't know why they are dragging
>> their feet to use the newer versions. I suspect that it presents
>> incompatibilities with other programs somewhere that they are waiting
>> to be fixed.
>>
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
>>>
>>> I guess the issue doesn't seem important enough to them yet, or this
>>> description hasn't made it clear enough.
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>
> There is an overlay that provides gentoo standard PAM + the patch for
> RLIMITS usability (beside a lot of nice software not in portage ;)).
>
> svn co svn://svn.tuxfamily.org/svnroot/ckpp/proaudio
>
> Might take ages till they include it into main portage, unfortunately.
> Gentoo provides realtime-lsm so far, i guess they think that's enough
> and easier anyway.
>
> HTH
> tom
>
this overlay is great!
but see what i get:
$ eix -e lash
* media-libs/lash [3]
Available versions: 0.5.0 0.5.1
Installed: none
Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/lash
Description: LASH Audio Session Handlern
* media-sound/lash
Available versions: 0.5.1
Installed: 0.5.1
Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/lash/
Description: LASH Audio Session Handler
[1] /usr/overlays/mine
[2] /usr/overlays/chutz
[3] /usr/overlays/proaudio
why is lash put in media-libs when it's in media-sound in gentoo.org?
Rossen
Received on Wed Apr 19 20:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 19 2006 - 20:15:05 EEST