Re: [linux-audio-user] LKML: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Apr 21 2006 - 16:32:25 EEST

Florian Schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:04:41 -0700
> "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>Hi,
>> This thread is happening on the Linux Kernel Mailing List. Since
>>I'm not a programmer I don't understand the full ramifications. Can
>>someone here tell me would this render the realtime-lsm module
>>unusable and if so what would I have to do to get realtime operation
>>without realtime-lsm?
> That would soooo suck, as my favourite distro is debian and the feature
> wishlist item for rtlimits enabled PAM is already several months old. I
> suppose they'll probably take another year to apply the goddamn patch to
> libpam.
> Maybe it is time to switch distros. Do [K]Ubuntu have this already?

There are patched pam packages for both sarge and etch on debrfa:
http://ftp.techweb.rfa.org/debrfa/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/
http://ftp.techweb.rfa.org/debrfa/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/

source packages are there as well in main/source/ for both.

-Eric Rz
Received on Fri Apr 21 20:15:02 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:15:02 EEST