Re: [linux-audio-user] Advice on FC5

From: Tim Howard <tdhoward@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Apr 25 2006 - 18:48:37 EEST

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 08:42 -0700, Tim Howard wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I need some advice (OK, a lot of advice) on what to do with my Linux
> > installation.
> >
> > Right now I am running FC3 + PlanetCCRMA, and I'm enjoying it a lot.
> > I'm using Ardour, Hydrogen, and a few other JACK compliant apps.
> > However, I have a few reasons for wanting to reinstall and/or upgrade
> > my distro.
> >
> > #1 I recently got some new hard drives which I would like to install.
> > #2 FC5 has just been released, and I'm curious to see what it's like.
> > #3 I tried to upgrade glibc on my current installation, and I <ahem>
> > "broke" it. I have pieced it back into a functioning system again,
> > but I doubt it will ever quite be the same.
> >
> > My first question is: Do I want to go to FC5? I don't think
> > PlanetCCRMA has anything for it yet, but I'm thinking of running it
> > OOTB. Is it usable for some simple use of JACK and friends? I hear
> > that it wouldn't have low latency. Is this true, and does that affect
> > me if I'm only recording one or two tracks at a time?
> >
> > Any help on this would be appreciated!
>
> The kernel that comes with FC5 is not going to give you the best
> performance. I'll release stuff in (hopefully) a week. I do have a
> kernel and the low level support stuff but there's a Festival happening
> here at CCRMA in a few days and I won't have _any_ time till it's over.
>
> Stay tuned to the Planet CCRMA mailing list...
> -- Fernando
>

Thanks a bunch, Fernando! I just realized last night that my system
(FC5 OOTB + Jack and Ardour) has about 42ms of latency, which I don't
think qualifies as low latency...

I do really like FC5, though. We'll stay tuned for a kernel release!

-TimH
Received on Wed Apr 26 00:15:10 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 26 2006 - 00:15:10 EEST