Re: [linux-audio-user] The MySpace terms for content

On Wed, 03 May 2006 15:41:17 -0400
Brett McCoy <idragosani@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> It looks like (as of May 1), that MySpace is claiming license to
> redistribute any content on their site, but the license goes away after
> you remove the content:
>
> "By displaying or publishing ("posting") any Content, messages, text,
> files, images, photos, video, sounds, profiles, works of authorship, or
> any other materials (collectively, "Content") on or through the
> Services, you hereby grant to MySpace.com, a non-exclusive, fully-paid
> and royalty-free, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense
> through unlimited levels of sublicensees) to use, copy, modify, adapt,
> translate, publicly perform, publicly display, store, reproduce,
> transmit, and distribute such Content on and through the Services.

How can anyone ever possibly track this sort of thing?

> This
> license will terminate at the time you remove such Content from the
> Services.

This is the exact reverse of what it used to say, so maybe they've
already had legal beagles breathing down their necks.

> You represent and warrant that: (i) you own the Content posted
> by you on or through the Services or otherwise have the right to grant
> the license set forth in this section, and (ii) the posting of your
> Content on or through the Services does not violate the privacy rights,
> publicity rights, copyrights, contract rights or any other rights of any
> person. You agree to pay for all royalties, fees, and any other monies
> owing any person by reason of any Content posted by you to or through
> the Services."
>
> Yikes

Exactly! Even with the change above it's still a horrendous piece of
spagetti

-- 
F