Loki Davison wrote:
> ARRG you used the bad words!!!! AMS?
I agree that AMS is buggy, and that om in many ways are better. But I
must admit that I found AMS even more fun/easy to work with than om. Esp
if you stick to the build-in modules in AMS, the modules work together
really smoothly. I know that defect, no-common-conventions, generic
interfaces LADSPA plugins isn't om's fault, but it's still part of the
user-experience.
But of course the buggyness and fact that it's unmaintained makes AMS
totally unusable for me too.
-- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk | quartet: http://www.anagrammer.dk http://www.atte.dk/gps | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositionsReceived on Fri Jul 14 04:15:12 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 14 2006 - 04:15:12 EEST