On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 14:21 -0400, Rob wrote:
> On Wed August 16 2006 14:07, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 13:59 -0400, Rob wrote:
> > > On Wed August 16 2006 13:16, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > > Expecting every artist to get permission before they
> > > > > create their art is just plain idiocy.
> > > > By your logic, it's OK to steal material from a
> > > > construction site if you're using it to create art.
> > > Be accurate. By that logic it's okay to take pictures of
> > > material on a construction site if he's using them to create
> > > art.
> > Copyright law says otherwise.
>
> You were discussing logic, not law. Huge difference.
>
Well, I happen to think the law is correct and logical in this case. My
creations are my property, and I should have the same right to make a
living by selling them as a sculptor or a baker or a carpenter does.
Copying my creations without my permission denies me the right to make a
living by selling my creations, in exactly the same way that theft
deprives a maker of physical objects of that right.
Lee
Received on Thu Aug 17 00:15:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 17 2006 - 00:15:02 EEST