On Thu August 24 2006 20:05, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> As much as I agree with you Lee on this, which may be a rare
> occasion between us, personally as you mentioned before, this
> entire debate was beaten to death, resurrected, and beaten to
I have an archive of the previous LinuxSampler discussions. It's
a few dozen messages. I challenge you to provide the message
ID's of any messages in those threads discussing the two
specific issues I brought up.
You can't, because everyone was too busy going, "Hey, they're
violating the GPL" or "No, they're not" or "Hmm, I wonder if
Tascam is behind this" to wonder if Linuxsampler is violating
the OSI trademark or the FSF's copyright on the text of the GPL.
Rob
Received on Fri Aug 25 04:15:08 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 25 2006 - 04:15:08 EEST