Re: [linux-audio-user] Intel Dual Core vs. AMD64

Arthur Moore wrote:
> I'm looking at getting a new laptop for audio production (current
> system is pentium IIIM 1.3Ghz, 512 M memory, 5200 RPM hard drive,
> Presonus Firepod running with FreeBob , not really cutting it). I'm
> wondering what people's opinions about the Intel dual core vs. an
> AMD64 bit processor, both with 2GB of memory, and a 100GB 7200 RPM
> hard drive. From my limited understanding the dual core is like a dual
> processor (maybe?) running in parallel. It seems to me that the dual
> core would be better than the AMD64 for audio production.

Hi Arthur,

I can't over-recommend getting a dual core PC (be it a laptop or
desktop). The amount of CPU throughput is much great for not a
considerably greater amount of cash.

64bit CPU extensions are becoming standard these days, and while 64bit
distros seem to just be coming into their own, you have complete 32bit
backwards compatibility if you find that your favourite distro isn't
64bit, or 64bit doesn't meet your needs.

Athlon64 X2 laptops don't seem to be particularly available at the
moment, instead you might want to look for the Core 2 Duo based laptops.
The earlier Core Duo (1st gen Core architecture) didn't include 64bit
extensions, which isn't really a problem, but it's something worth
taking into consideration.

I've found in the past that AMD based chipsets (particularly laptop
ones) seem to have some issues with Linux. Things seem to be much better
with very recent kernels, but Intel chipsets seems to work better in
general.

Battery consumption on the Intel Core platform seems to be better than
the AMD mobile platform, though I'm not sure how much this would be a
problem if you're mainly running off of the power mains.

Hopefully this helps some ..

later,
Steve
Received on Tue Sep 12 08:15:02 2006