On 9/12/06, Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>
> > Ooh, you documented your problems in all detail, posted about
> > them and/or filed bug reports?
>
> Something like that, yeah (except the bug report part, reason explained
> below)...
>
> I forgot to mention that it wasn't really a problem with lash itself,
> but the quickly-done lash-implementation in some of the programs I used
> (and want to use), most notably specimen and zynaddsubfx.
>
> Reason for no bug report:
> Both programs are not very actively maintained, and lash support from
> the users point of view is a matter of finding the right patch and
> applying it to the source. This means that there's not really *one*
> person to talk to, since the people maintaining the software didn't
> implement the lash support and the authors of patches doesn't maintain
> the software.
>
> --
> peace, love & harmony
> Atte
>
I think Dave wrote the current lash code in specimen, so he might be
interested in reports.
Loki
Received on Wed Sep 13 04:15:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 13 2006 - 04:15:03 EEST