Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Software recommendation

Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> <...>
>
>> I'd also say SEQ24 is your best run for your time. GTK, very lean, very
>> simplistic. Does what you want. One drawback: Sequence lengths cannot be
>> arbitrary, 1,2,4,8,16,32 or 64 bars. If this is a showstopper I would
>> recommend writing to the author (or starting a campaign for people to
>> write to the author) and ask for that.
>>
>> The next closest bet would be Rosegarden, but that's a full-fledged KDE
>> App, which is why I stay away from it.
>>
>> Another option is Jazz++, which is fairly good but doesn't get a lot of
>> press for some reason. It's cross-platform but fairly lightweight on linux.
>>
>> Still, I'd love to see Seq24 implement arbitrary sequence lengths
>> myself... and it's such an exceptional program in how useful it is and
>> how simple it is at the same time.
>>
>
> It's that time of year again, I feel like trying to push the word about MusE
> some...
>
> Any particular reason why you'd find MusE to be a bad solution for this?
>
> Being a MusE developer and long time user, I'm merely asking as to understand
> what other users lack in MusE that we might fix to make it better (apart from
> mediocre publicity...).
>
Hi Robert,
for me Muse is a very nice sequencer. I use both Muse and Rosegarden,
alternately , since I like to follow the development of both.

I'm really looking forward to see the envelopes for automating effect
paramenters.

Cheers,

c.
> This questions is definately not just directed at Carlo.
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
>
>> Carlo
>>
>
>

-- 
http://www.cesaremarilungo.com