Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Software recommendation

From: Cesare Marilungo <cesare@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Nov 29 2006 - 14:11:09 EET

carmen wrote:
>> Puredata's strong point is not sequencing and notation,
>>
>
> sure but then neither is it the forte of linux audio software in general. for sequencing i definitely dig Pd+Tk a lot more than eithe seq24 or Dino, since youve got full access to the data for further massaging/accessing in unconventional ways without being bound to a clicky-clicky GTK workflow.. and arent bound to MIDI-enforced notions of what is a track, what is a folder of tracks, what is a region, etc..
>
> http://replic.net/~ix/pr/seq.png for note/part editing, http://replic.net/~ix/pr/lg.gif for streaming control-data. just grab /extensions/gui/ix/{mat,lg}.wid and [widget]..plug the xlets into PDContainer, Pool, or the storage of your choice and get editing...using del, metro, pipe, or what have you for playback..
>
Carmen, where is the [widget] external?

Can you provide some more instructions to install these awesome stuff?
Is there some documentation to extend or write my own widgets?

Thanks in advance,

c.
>
>>> so what
>>> I need is an application that I can send midi notes and controller data
>>> through, which will remember them and pass them on to Puredata
>>>
>
> for this i like rradical-style figure-8 abstraction to timestamp events and shuttle them onto storage - you can alligator-clip them anywhere in a patch, instead of having to keep track of midiout's and range remapping into/out-of midi and the subsequent resolution loss..
>
> cheers,
> c
>
>
>

-- 
http://www.cesaremarilungo.com
Received on Wed Nov 29 16:15:10 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 29 2006 - 16:15:11 EET