Hysterical Raisins - Was: [linux-audio-user] Re: Software recommendation

From: Folderol <folderol@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Dec 04 2006 - 00:38:09 EET

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:33:31 +0100
Robert Jonsson <rj@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Hi guys,

> It's that time of year again, I feel like trying to push the word about MusE
> some...
> Any particular reason why you'd find MusE to be a bad solution for this?
> Being a MusE developer and long time user, I'm merely asking as to understand
> what other users lack in MusE that we might fix to make it better (apart from
> mediocre publicity...).
> This questions is definately not just directed at Carlo.
> Regards,
> Robert

When I first came onto the Linux Audio scene I tried both Muse &
Rosegarden. Muse had a *requirement* for LASH and Rosegarden didn't. At
that time not only did I not want LASH - still have never used it - but
my elderly Mandrake install dived into dependency hell if I tried to
install it.

I had a quick peek at Muse recently, but I'm now so familiar with
Rosegarden it just doesn't feel right.

Will J G
Received on Mon Dec 4 04:15:02 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 04 2006 - 04:15:02 EET