On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 01:11 +0100, Esben Stien wrote:
> My answer was that the user does this himself. Each time the user
> visits the wiki, if there is spam there, he reverts it to a previous
> revision.
this gets really tedious when the last 23 revisions are all spam. this
happens, really.
> We can have a feed, like Fugal, that notifies us of updates; if
> someone spams we'll know immediately,
so now you're asking a limited set of people who get update
notifications to do the work rather than asking individual people to
register?
ever since browsers started managing passwords, its only the
registration phase that is a pain. its small and its one-time.
Received on Sat Dec 16 04:15:04 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 16 2006 - 04:15:04 EET