"The tools you use to make your music affect the way you make it, so
affect your music."
Oh yes, I agree--the process should encourage and enhance, but never dictate
or let the musician fall back on pre-programmed formulas. However, the
listener should only hear music, not the tools themselves.
"You can't analyse all the parameters that affect your spirit, just be
conscious the you are not a numeric working machine and not close like
a chip to your envirronment."
Not 100% certain what you mean, but I *think* it reflects my feelings.
Cheers!
--Nick
On 12/24/06, David Causse <nomoa@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 07:02:17PM -0800, Nick Scheer wrote:
> > Whoah. Have you considered switching to decaf?
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > Seriously, I make music on Linux because I like Linux/FOSS, and I like
> > to make music. I also love having access to great FREE tools, even if
> > I have to work a little harder to put it all together.
> >
> > I personally don't feel that the tools used to create are all that
> > relevant to someone listening to the finished product.
>
> Try to see the question with another point of view.
> The tools you use to make your music affect the way you make it, so
> affect your music.
> You can't analyse all the parameters that affect your spirit, just be
> conscious the you are not a numeric working machine and not close like
> a chip to your envirronment.
>
> my 2 bits
>
>
Received on Mon Dec 25 00:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 25 2006 - 00:15:05 EET