Re: GP2X as a RealTime Audio generating device (was Re: [linux-audio-user] status of ams)

From: Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 12 2007 - 23:14:32 EET

Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Ok, I'm currently running csound live on a P4 mobile 1.6GHz. Let's
>> call this soft synth index 100. What would you estimate the index of
>> GP2X to be? Just a serious, guess, I'm not gonna come after you if
>> your wrong :-)
>>
>
> I'd give it between 40 - 60, depending on what you're doing in CSound ..
>
>> Secondly, would there be any problems (if so which and could they be
>> solved) in getting 1) csound, 2) ams and 3) zynadsubfx running on
>> these things?
>
> CSound: a cynch.

Ok you got my attention!

I read that it's a 2.4 kernel, right? From what I know (I run 2.6) 2.4
has really poor realtime performance out of the box. Do you know:

1) What patches have been applied to the kernel in gp2x?

2) How difficult it would be to replace the kernel with a recent 2.6

3) what latencies have you been able to achieve (with the break-out box
for audio) with the supplied kernel? I'm not interested in hypothetical
performance but real world examples.

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk      | quintet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
                         | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions
Received on Sat Jan 13 00:15:01 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 13 2007 - 00:15:01 EET