On 1/16/07, Mark Knecht <markknecht@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Aaron and I are buddies so it's always fun to point out the other POV.
> ;-) In the end he's probably right though. :-)
>
> At the outset I'll state that mostly I record at 44.1K. My issue in
> the past has been that all frequency resamplers seem to cause negative
> artifacts to my ears. When I record at 48K I like the sound, but when
> I down-sample that material to 44.1K I find I don't like the sound as
> much as I do if I just recorded the same material at 44.1K in the
> first place.
If there were a way to record at 441x48000 sample rate, all our
problems would be solved. Until then, it is possible to record on two
machines at the same time, though I don't know how useful that would
be.
-Chuckk
Received on Thu Jan 18 20:15:11 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 20:15:11 EET