Re: [linux-audio-user] Aldrin 0.9 and llvm

On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> I understand that Aldrin w/o lunar, ladspa, dssi or anything is
> pretty pointless, right?

actually, ladspa and dssi were not meant to be supported. i did the
wrappers only for fun, in fact i think it's a terrible idea to have them
at all.

lunar is important, and llvm is a heavy dependency, i agree. perhaps i
can swap llvm for gcc, which everybody should have...

if you are interested in the reason why llvm is included at all, i can
perhaps explain a little.

-- 
Leonard Ritter
-- Freelance Art & Logic
-- http://www.leonard-ritter.com