Re: [linux-audio-user] Aldrin 0.9 and llvm

Thomas Kuther <gimpel@email-addr-hidden> schrieb:

> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:26 +0100
> Leonard Ritter <contact@email-addr-hidden-ritter.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> > > I understand that Aldrin w/o lunar, ladspa, dssi or anything is
> > > pretty pointless, right?
> >
> > actually, ladspa and dssi were not meant to be supported. i did the
> > wrappers only for fun, in fact i think it's a terrible idea to have
> > them at all.
> >
> > lunar is important, and llvm is a heavy dependency, i agree.
> > perhaps i can swap llvm for gcc, which everybody should have...
> >
> > if you are interested in the reason why llvm is included at all, i
> > can perhaps explain a little.
> >
>
> Yes, I (and maybe others) would be interested. I never heard of it
> before and am just starting to see what it is good for.
>
> Currently all i know about it is that it tends to cause massive
> headaches for packagers and others trying to compile it :)
>

There isn't any llvm package on SuSE so I have to package llvm to? It is
a little bit overkill for another sequenzer. For the moment i keep
aldrin-0.8 and libzzub-0.1.
Received on Mon Jan 22 20:15:06 2007