======= On Friday 23 February 2007, Hartmut Noack wrote: =======
>
> > The thing is, real resolution of almost all
> > DACs is not better rather 14-15 bits. Very rare and very expensive DACs
> > have real resolution about 20-21 bits.
> >
>
> May it be :-) the switch from 16/44.1 to 24/96 is very well audible
> anyway :-). I guess, for the realworld-usage of this card signal/noise
> ratio is of greater importance then the question, if the DAC could
> compute even greater resolution then the one I hear.
>
Well, I didn't say about 96KHz at all :-) What about difference between
16/44 and 24/44? As for me, I'm not sure, I'll detect difference at blind
testing. Probably, my ears aren't golden ;-)
At any case, IMHO the main problem is DACs realization rather format
limitation.
Andrew
Received on Fri Feb 23 12:15:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 23 2007 - 12:15:03 EET