On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 11:53 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>
> This is basically an existance proof that there are normalised floating
> point numbers that will not survive the
>
> float32 -> pcm24 -> float 32
>
> transformation.
i stand humbly corrected. i guess i confused the fidelity of pcm24 ->
float32 -> pcm24 with its "inverse". thanks for the clarification.
--p
Received on Mon Mar 5 04:15:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 05 2007 - 04:15:03 EET