On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:27 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Bengt Gördén hat gesagt: // Bengt Gördén wrote:
>
> > fredag 30 mars 2007 00:38 skrev Robin Gareus:
> > > X-BeenThere: linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> > > X-BeenThere: linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> > > X-BeenThere: linux-audio-announce@email-addr-hidden
> >
> > Sure. It will probably take care of the problem but the X-headers are not
> > standard (although they are used quite frequently). The List-ID is.
> >
> > I'm not sure how it would look but something like this I expect. Mind you. Not
> > an @ but rather a dot(.) in between.
> >
> > List-id: lad.lists.linuxaudio.org
> > List-id: lau.lists.linuxaudio.org
> > List-id: laa.lists.linuxaudio.org
>
> I would love if the current List-id's could be kept, except the
> list-addresses.
Same here. List-Id headers allow you to "Reply to list" in clients that
support it - no need to "Reply to all", creating confusing extra To:
addresses, or type in the address manually and lose the In-Reply-To
headers, thus ruining the thread structure.
--ll
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 30 2007 - 16:15:03 EEST