Re: [LAU] Re: That must suck. For me it's about beauty--musicisjustone path

From: Chuckk Hubbard <badmuthahubbard@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Apr 06 2007 - 03:10:02 EEST

On 4/5/07, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:57:32PM -0400, Charles Linart wrote:
>
> > If notes are notes only because I've been "conditioned" for them, why
> > do the same notes show up in music all over the world?
>
> Simple fact is they don't.

Perfect fifths do. Octaves do to, maybe to a lesser extent. Both are
almost ubiquitous, and not all of the cultures using them learned them
from each other. I think it's more accurate to say that non-notes are
non-notes because we haven't been exposed to them.

> > Whatever the explanation, the bushman and Mozart incorporate the
> > same 12 fundamental harmonics in their music.
>
> No they don't. And there is nothing 'fundamental' to these 12 tones.

I agree. If there are harmonics common to almost all music, it's more
like 3 or 4 of them than 12.

-Chuckk

-- 
http://www.badmuthahubbard.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Apr 6 04:15:08 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 06 2007 - 04:15:08 EEST