Re: [LAU] Re: Re: Re: That must suck. For me it's about beauty?--musicisjustone path

From: Chuckk Hubbard <badmuthahubbard@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Apr 06 2007 - 16:23:12 EEST

On 4/6/07, Ismael Valladolid Torres <ivalladt@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Chuckk Hubbard escribe:
> > Schoenberg used lots of harmony. He wrote a textbook on harmony. His
> > atonal systems even had some highly-developed ways of using harmony.
>
> Not exactly. According to one colleague in other mailing list, he
> wrote the most advanced textbook on harmony ever written.
>
> Obviously if you use the twelve notes, some of them will sound
> harmonically in any moment.

We looked at a Schoenberg piece in freshman theory where he used a
three-note tone row over and over again in both melodic and harmonic
forms. None of the harmonies violated it. I believe it was 0, 1, 4.
I don't recall the piece, but it was pretty strict. The tone row was
not merely a melodic rule. The harmonic rules of his system may not
have been tonal, but they existed.

-Chuckk

-- 
http://www.badmuthahubbard.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Apr 6 20:15:01 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 06 2007 - 20:15:01 EEST