On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:04:43AM -0700, Mike Taht wrote:
> I have spent the last year recording extensively at 96khz. There are only
> three real features of 96khz recording that I notice:
>
> 1) Stereo imaging seems slightly better
> 2) Mixing it is much easier, much more headroom, I haven't used a compressor
> in ages
> 3) Recording low volume (environmental) sounds sounds much better.
This looks more like your 44.1 or 48kHz HW having problems than any
inherent advantage of 96 kHz.
-- FA Follie! Follie! Delirio vano è questo ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat Apr 21 20:15:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 21 2007 - 20:15:03 EEST