Paul,
Has there ever been any demostrable differences between 16/44.1 and 24/96k?
Bearcat
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 22:07 -0500, Reuben Martin wrote:
>> I helping a friend out who wants to put together a linux / ardour setup.
>>
>> However, the sound device he origionally suggested was RME's Fireface,
which is a no-go.
>>
>> I'm having trouble finding a device with similar specs. Does anybody
have any suggestions on devices that work with linux (alsa or freebob)
that can handle the 192k sample rate, have at least 8 analog line level
inputs (not concerned about preamps) and are in the same price range?
>>
>> There are lots of nice units out there, but finding something that can
handle 192k kinda reduces the selection really quickly.
>
> it will reduce your disk space even more rapidly, for no benefit that
has EVER been demonstrated in a double blind test. oh, it will also
increase the CPU load making super low latencies harder to achieve (and
perhaps impossible to achieve) until processor speeds increase 4 fold.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Apr 23 20:15:04 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 23 2007 - 20:15:04 EEST