Re: [LAU] Re: Ext2 or Ext3 for Audio?

From: david <gnome@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Jun 28 2007 - 06:25:06 EEST

Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Karl Hammar hat gesagt: // Karl Hammar wrote:
>
>> Kjetil:
>> ...
>>> Yes. Ext2 is generally dangerous.
>> ...
>>
>> That statement is void if you mount it read-only, which is perfectly
>> ok for /boot and /usr.
>
> But if you don't write, my uneducated guess is, that any journalling
> overhead from ext3 over ext2 is void, too.

Of course, if you don't WRITE, your ability to RECORD is going to be
rather limited. Which was what the original poster needed. ;-)

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jun 28 08:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 28 2007 - 08:15:02 EEST