Re: [LAU] newbie to Linux audio

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:56 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> On 18 July 2007 at 7:35, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > Same here. I normally use 24 bit 48 kHz, but 96 works fine as well.
> > Recording straight into Ardour.
>
> So, what's the advantage of 48kHz over 44.1kHz? Does that advantage
> outweigh whatever distortion is introduced from the sample rate
> conversion going to 44.1kHz, in the event that the recording is
> destined for a CD? I'm not partial to either rate, just curious
> about the advantages & disadvantages.

Is there really any audible distortion if you resample offline using a
sinc resampler with a very large window?

--ll

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user