Appreciate the response thank you. Always happy to be proven wrong;)
Seablade
On 8/7/07, Stéphane Letz <letz@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > (CC-ed to jack-audio-dev list)
> >
> >
> > "Thomas Vecchione":
> >>
> >> Seablade
> >>
> >> On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede@email-addr-hidden>
> >>>>
> >>>> I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores
> >>>> right
> >>> now?
> >>>
> >>> No.
> >>>
> >> Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will handle 4,8, or
> >> 16 cores
> >> well?
> >>
> >
> > Sorry, that was a short rude answer, especially since I'm not 100%
> > sure of
> > the answer either. But I would be surprised if jackdmp was limited
> > to two,
> > or any other high-value fixed number of, parallel sound processing
> > threads.
> >
> > And on the other hand, if you are wrong, which I think you are,
> > although
> > I'm not 100% sure about that, you could be responsible for
> > continuing to spread a(nother) misunderstanding about jackdmp. (The
> > previous one was that jackdmp could not work on single processor
> > machines)
> >
> >
>
>
> jackdmp can handle *any* number of cores. What jackdmp does in
> changing the jack clients scheduling model from a purely sequential
> one to a "data-flow" like one: as soon a jack clients become
> runnable, they are activated by the OS which is then responsible to
> run them on any available processor. A Jack client become runnable
> when all of it's input clients have been run, and this of course
> depends of the graph topology.
>
> Stephane
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Aug 7 20:15:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 07 2007 - 20:15:03 EEST