[LAU] Re: Goodbye ReplyTo munging...

Am 2007-08-14 05:55:25, schrieb Chris McCormick:
> My vote is for people to 'reply to all' when they want to reply to
> all/list, and 'reply' when they want to reply just to the sender (keep
> it how it is right now, as is supported in all mail clients).

The problem is, that most peoples are to sick or lazzy to remove the
Private-Address when using Reply-To-All. I receive per day 10-20
Carbon Copies and sometime I was wondering WHY the message does NOT
APPEAR in the lists... Argh!!!

I am subscribed with TWO E-Mails on this list, One which suck the
messages and is 100% SPAM-FREE and then the second, which I use to
post here, which receive per day between 500 and 38.000 SPAMs.

I have configured my procmail/MUA, that if I am IN the LAU/LAD folder
I use the List-Reply but if I am in my "linux4michelle" folder I use
"Reply" which mean, if someone use "Reply-To-All" and do not remove
my E-Mail I get it twice and since I check "linux4michelle" before
"LAU/LAD" I will end up in PM's.

      I am voting for a "Driver-License" for the Internet-Use.

Greetings
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant

-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user