Re: [LAU] Ardour 2.1 Mixer Levelmeters acting very slow with acpi=off

From: Susanne Schneider <susemuse27@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Nov 21 2007 - 09:08:11 EET

will try this later today and let you know
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:52:58 +0100
> Von: Thomas Kuther <gimpel@email-addr-hidden>
> An: linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> Betreff: Re: [LAU] Ardour 2.1 Mixer Levelmeters acting very slow with acpi=off

> On Di, 20.11.07 14:42 "Susanne Schneider" <susemuse27@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > hi everybody,
> > as an experiment on this item I compiled a kernel with modified
> > config: I removed acpi completely and additionally deactivated the
> > option "enable tickless..." (or so..). Then I booted the kernel with
> > standard options. Result: Ardour behaves as it should, everything
> > works just fine, system audio performance at it's best! Obviously
> > there is a diffenrence between booting an acpi-enabled kernel with
> > option "acpi=off" and a kernel built without acpi capabilities. Maybe
> > somebody has an explanation - I don't... thanks for attention anyway
> > Su
>
> Interesting!
> So my guess with cpufreq and clocksource was wrong.
> It's dyntics vs. acpi=off
>
> What if you disable dyntics, and boot with acpi enabled?

-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Nov 21 12:15:01 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 21 2007 - 12:15:01 EET