Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations

From: Ismael Valladolid Torres <ivalladt@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Dec 06 2007 - 20:46:52 EET

Bill White escribe:
> True. But Inkscape is a much simpler program. It does less, so it's not as
> confusing as the Gimp. If I had mentioned Inkscape that's what I would have
> meant, if I ever spoke in the subjunctive mood, which I would never do.

I can't agree. Inkscape is simply designed for a completely different
task. Both Inkscape and the GIMP kick asses, each one in what it's
designed for.

Cordially, Ismael

-- 
Ismael Valladolid Torres            GnuPG key: DE721AF4
                                       Jabber: ivalladt@email-addr-hidden
http://usuarios.lycos.es/ivalladt/      Skype: ivalladt

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature

Received on Fri Dec 7 00:15:05 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kevin Cosgrove: "Re: [LAU] audio interview - reducing bumps and peaks?"
Previous message: Asmo Koskinen: "Re: [LAU] ANNOUNCE: Rosegarden 1.6.0 released"
In reply to: Bill White: "Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations"
Next in thread: david: "Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations"
Reply: david: "Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 07 2007 - 00:15:05 EET