Hi Jan,
> 1) the
> ability to directly ask the author(s) for a feature or bug fix and ....
Well, i thought of that, too. But that was more a general open-source
issue to me and
not directly connected with making music.
> 2) The "company"
> can go out of business and the tool won't be unsupported (unless
> absolutely no one was using it). Even in that case, if you have some
> money, you could probably hire someone to do some work on it.
Of course you could but again: I tried to focus on what a musician would
think:
He won't try to proceed with the development of a tool when the project
is shut
down. At least not the musicians i know. They want to produce music as easy
as possible :)
Thanks for your ideas.
Best regards,
Sebastian.
web: linuxaudioblog.sternenhejim.de
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Dec 11 12:15:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 11 2007 - 12:15:01 EET